Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Freedom Of Expression And Democracy †

Question: Discuss about the Freedom Of Expression And Democracy. Answer: Introduction According to Article 19, the Freedom of speech is the principle which includes the freedom set for an individual or the community. This is mainly to articulate the opinions with better ideas which are set without any fear related to the realization, censorship, and the sanctions. The freedom of expression states that everyone shall have the right to hold the opinions without any interference, with freedom to seek, receive and then impart information of all kinds (Hughes, 2015). This is regardless of the frontiers which are set orally or in the printing form. The special duties and the responsibilities are subjected to certain restrictions which are important for the rights or reputation of the other people. The fundamental right is restricted mainly in the form of tactics that include the censorship and the other restrictive press legislation with harassment of journalists, who voice their opinions. Thesis statement The freedom of expression is the purpose for which the power can rightly be exercised over the members of the community to prevent harm to the people. Discussion According to the efforts included to create the legal mechanism banning language with defamatory of religions to UN Council in Geneva, there is a need to educate the member states on the key freedom of expression (Stewart, 2017). The Article 19 tends to monitor the threats which are set to free expression with adopting the laws that conform to the international standards of freedom of expression. The article clearly depicts about the individuals or the groups who have been violated and they tend to provide the capacity building support for the non-governmental organizations as well (Tuinman Ten Hoorn, 2017). The idea for the offense principle is to justify the speech limitations which are set in the form of expressions that are offensive to the society. The consideration is about the changing time and applications wherein free communication of ideas and opinions is important for maintaining the rights of man. Evaluation Analysis This is to understand the fundamentals in a democracy where the norms are set for limiting the expression which might not be completely suppressed mainly in emergency times. Hence, the notable fact is about the self-government by the people. For such a system, it is important to work with an informed electorate. There shall be no constraints on the information flow and the respective ideas (Stone, 2017). The citizens include the right to seek information, receive and impart information and ideas. The expression is then closely related to the other rights which can be limited with conflicting to the other rights. The right to freedom of expression is the right to the fair trial and the proceeding of the court which limits the access for proper information search. One needs to determine the right to privacy and reputation of others. This is important for media which plays an important role and as a bearer for the general rights to freedom of expression. The conditions are outlined with constrained freedom of speech where media encompasses and suppressed information in freedom of speech. The degree is defined to work on different approaches to issues like the hate speech, obscenity and the definition of the laws which could be seen in the democracies which are liberal. Everyone has the right to give their opinion and express themselves according to Article 19. Conclusion The democracy will not be true if deal is in power to manipulate the electorate, by withholding information and stifling the criticism (Jelen et al., 2017). With the freedom of expression campaign, the individuals need to employ advocacy with financial support and the technical assistance to support efforts done by the local free expressions. It includes the advocacy to oppose or overturn the laws of media that tend to restrict the journalists. References Hughes, P., 2015. Freedom of speech.Pointers: Bulletin of the Christian Research Association,25(1), p.8. Jelen, T.G., Lewis, A.R. and Djupe, P.A., 2017. Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Speech: The Effects of Alternative Rights Frames on Mass Support for Public Exemptions.Journal of Church and State, p.csw101. Stewart, D. R. (2017). Free Speech Unfree News: The Paradox of Press Freedom in America.Journalism History,43(1), 56. Stone, A. (2017). Viewpoint Discrimination, Hate Speech Laws, and the Double-Sided Nature of Freedom of Speech.Const. Comment.,32, 687. Tuinman, P.R. and Ten Hoorn, S., 2017. Freedom of speech for all critically ill patients: work in progress.Critical Care,21(1), p.27.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.